Back to Community

Maximum drawdown constraints in portfolio optimization

SHSharpeShooter
3d ago
2,411 views
28 posts
strategy
risk-management
optimization

Incorporating max drawdown constraints into portfolio optimization is tricky because drawdown is path-dependent.

Approaches I've tried:

  • CVaR proxy (conditional value at risk as drawdown surrogate)
  • Scenario-based constraints using historical drawdown episodes
  • Dynamic volatility targeting (reduce exposure when vol spikes)
  • Method 3 seems most practical for daily rebalancing competitions.

    27 Replies

    34
    VOVolTrader2d ago

    I'd recommend reading "Quantitative Portfolio Management" by Michael Isichenko. It's the best practical guide I've found.

    2
    BUBugHunter991d ago

    For those new to the platform: start with the tutorial competition. It has a smaller dataset and more forgiving scoring.

    15
    VOVolTrader2d ago

    Have you considered using PCA to reduce the dimensionality of the feature space? I found that the first 10 components capture 80%+ of the variance.

    27
    NEnewbie_trader1d ago

    I've found that sector neutrality is a key factor in the scoring. Strategies that are long one sector and short another tend to underperform.

    16
    DADataSciPro18h ago

    Can confirm this approach works. I implemented something similar and jumped from rank 150 to rank 23 in two weeks.

    4
    MIMicroAlpha21h ago

    I ran a quick backtest on this idea and got a Sharpe of about 1.2 before costs. Not bad for a simple strategy.

    18
    COCovarianceKid20h ago

    This is a common pitfall. Make sure your features are computed before the prediction date, not on it. That's subtle look-ahead bias.

    Post a Reply